static image

Month: March 2025

We Were Not Silent in Brussels: Supporting Parents of Deaf Children

Supporting Parents of Deaf Children, part of the core mission of SILENT
Supporting Parents of Deaf Children

The final event of the SILENT project was held on 21 of March in Brussels. IPA was there. The conference, aiming at promoting the theme and outcomes of the project, supporting parents of deaf children, also had an outlook on the future and further work to be done in the field.

In wonderful sunny weather and the inspiring environment of the Permanent Representation of Steiermark, Austria, project partners were joined by representatives from organisations working in the field in Belgium specifically Flanders, as well as some European level NGO representatives.

Shared Expertise and Storytelling Innovation

For inspiration, Evelien Dirks, senior researcher and program director of the Deaf and Hard of Hearing Research and Development program of the Dutch Foundation for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing Child (NSDSK) from Amsterdam shared details of their work. The methodologies they use to incentivize the active participation of children in storytelling sessions was really interesting, and something that is surely not only for deaf or hard-of-hearing children.

Supporting Parents of Deaf Children: Themes and Future Directions

The keynote was followed by four short knowledge-sharing sessions. One was sharing information about the project itself. The second one was focusing on the needs of families and triggered interesting discussions. One of the main topics emerging – and paving the way for a future project – was the need to also provide support for deaf parents of hearing children.

This is something we have been planning for some time. It was interesting to understand that the challenges they are facing are very similar to that of migrant families’. This similarity can be something to build on when addressing the issue. We can only hope that two groups of so different parents realizing that their challenges are so similar can lead to more inclusive thinking.

Addressing Challenges and Institutional Influences

Another main discussion point was the role of and potential need for support from governments, but concerns were raised about the cochlear implant lobby having too big an influence on them nowadays. In another discussion group, the one-sided training of medical professionals was raised. It is something that also leads to more pressure on parents to make quick decisions about implantation – often leading to disappointment according to the case studies shared.

In the fourth group, there was a really meaningful discussion about a co-creating approach to projects that include representatives of deaf communities. With a major emphasis on the much-needed “nothing about them without them” approach, it was also raised that sometimes institutional politics also play a role and may result in a change of approach halfway through a project.

Building a Future of Inclusion and Support

It was a very useful event that made it possible for us to look into possible new partnerships in the future to continue Parents International’s efforts in supporting parents of deaf children – and all parents who have people with disabilities in their family. It also reinforced that our previously produced materials for parents of children with disabilities as well as migrant parents can be very easily used in the context of deafness.

However, it is important to keep in mind that while deafness is considered a disability by the medical community and many in the hearing population, deaf people consider themselves a healthy minority with sign language as their mother tongue and related, but distinct culture – and this message was reinforced by the many deaf participants. The acquisition of sign language by hearing parents of deaf children must be given priority as well as learning sign language even for those who have been successfully implanted.

Parents’ Perspectives on Digital Literacy, AI, and Crisis Preparedness: Insights from the DRONE Project

The Erasmus+ Research Project DRONE (Disinformation Resilience Online Education) aims to strengthen digital literacy and combat disinformation among vulnerable adolescent groups through a holistic ecosystem approach. A crucial part of this project involves understanding parents’ perspectives, as they play a pivotal role in shaping their children’s digital skills and resilience.

The recently completed Parents’ Synthetic Report on the Thematic Analysis, developed by IPA, synthesizes insights from qualitative interviews with 135 parents across six European countries: Hungary, Cyprus, Germany, the Netherlands, Italy, and Greece. The report provides a valuable comparative analysis of parents’ views on digital literacy, artificial intelligence (AI), school engagement, and crisis preparedness, revealing both shared concerns and national differences.

Demographics and Digital Access

The study highlights significant variations in parents’ educational backgrounds. In Cyprus and Greece, university degrees are more prevalent, whereas Hungary, the Netherlands, and Italy present a broader spectrum of educational levels. These differences impact parents’ ability to engage with digital literacy initiatives and support their children’s online learning.

Linguistic diversity further influences parental involvement. While most parents in Hungary and Germany speak the national language at home, a substantial number of parents in the Netherlands use a different language. This poses challenges in accessing school communications and national education policies. Additionally, minority groups and families from low socioeconomic backgrounds, particularly in Italy and the Netherlands, face additional barriers to educational resources and digital tools.

School Priorities and Bullying Experiences

Parents across all six countries highlight the need for:

  • Stronger parental engagement in school activities.
  • Better support for linguistic diversity in education.
  • Improved school resources, including food quality, outdoor learning opportunities, and teacher availability.
  • Mental health support and reduced homework loads to create a balanced academic environment.

Bullying remains a widespread concern, with parents reporting experiences of physical, psychological, and online bullying. In some contexts, bullying is associated with physical appearance, socioeconomic status, and hygiene, making certain student groups more vulnerable. The report underscores the necessity of effective intervention strategies that account for cultural and systemic differences.

Trust, Decision-Making, and Digital Literacy

Parents rely heavily on teachers and family members as their primary sources of trusted information. However, while teachers and school leaders are seen as reliable for school-related topics, parents demonstrate diverse media consumption habits. Some favor traditional news outlets, while others rely increasingly on online platforms, highlighting the importance of media literacy and critical thinking skills.

When it comes to digital literacy and AI, the report reveals that awareness and understanding vary significantly. While some parents are familiar with AI technologies and their potential benefits, others express concerns about data privacy, algorithmic bias, and job automation. The findings emphasize the need for targeted educational initiatives to enhance parents’ understanding of AI’s societal implications.

Crisis Preparedness and Students with Disabilities

The study also examines parents’ awareness of crisis preparedness in schools. Findings suggest that levels of awareness and confidence in crisis response strategies differ widely. Some parents raise concerns about communication and coordination during emergency situations, emphasizing the importance of clear school protocols and parental involvement.

In addition, the report explores the unique challenges faced by students with disabilities in the digital space. Parents stress the need for:

  • Accessible digital education tools.
  • Inclusive learning environments.
  • Stronger protections against online disinformation and cyberbullying for vulnerable students.

Conclusion

The DRONE project’s Parents’ Synthetic Report provides a comprehensive, cross-national analysis of parental perspectives on digital literacy, AI, school engagement, and crisis preparedness. The findings highlight the importance of addressing diverse parental concerns to foster digital resilience and combat disinformation among young people.

By strengthening collaboration between parents, schools, and policymakers, the DRONE project aims to build a more inclusive and equitable digital education ecosystem—one that empowers all students to navigate the complexities of the digital age with confidence and critical awareness.

More from Parents International

​Parents – inspiring protagonists of cyberbullying prevention

Empowering Education: inspiring lessons from the Brookings Symposium

EFFEct – Stakeholder perspectives on school performance

Empowering Educators: Inspiring Large-Scale International Parents Alliance Teacher Training in Kazakhstan